THE INFLUENCE OF CROSS CULTURAL
UNDERSTANDING IN LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGE TO INCREASE SPEAKING ABILITY
Anni Alimatul Azizah
State Institute for Islamic Studies of Metro, St. Ki Hajar Dewantara, 15
A Metro, Indonesia
Corresponding email: Anniazizah035@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This study was aimed at increase student speaking
ability. The total number of the assessment is found in the students' oral
tests is 55 for grades less than 75 or less than the average and 110 for grades
over 75 or more of the rated divided into five groups of assessment: Assessment
in pronounce the words, assessment in their intonation, assessment in their
articulation, assessment in fluency to pronounce the words, and in the used of
diction. The results of the study indicate that the students faced many
problems such as (1) they did not pronounced the words correctly; (2) they
intonation is not true, so can make the listeners not understand; (3) they did
not pronounced the words with the right articulation; (4) they did not fluency
to pronounce the words; (5) they did not choose the right diction. The total
assessment found in the students' oral test is 55 for grades less than 75 or
less than average and 110 for grades over 75 or more of the average rated into
five types of assessment. The result of the assessment analysis data shows that
the most prominent assessment is the error in the production of verbs. There
are 12 people who scored less than 75 and 21 people who scored more than 75 in
assessment to pronounce the words. It is followed by the assessment in their
intonation. The total number of this assessment is 11 people who score less
than 75 and 22 people who score more than 75. The assessment in their
articulation in the third rank with the total number of 9 people who scored
less than 75 and 24 people Who scored more than 75. The next is the assessment
of 10 people who scored less than 75 and 23 people who scored more than 75. The
last is the assessment in the used Of diction with the total number of 13
people who scored less than 75 and 20 people who scored more than 75.
Keywords: Cross Cultural Understanding, Foreign Language,
Speaking.
1. INTRODUCTION
Language is very important in human life.
We are able to communicate with other people that use language, not only it but
also we are able to express our thought, our feeling and our experiences
through language. There are many language in the world so, there are many
countries have different language. We are able to communicate with other people
in the world that use international language.
An international language that used in the
world is English; it is a foreign language, especially in Indonesia. We learn
English from elementary school till university. There are for skills in English
learning should be able to mastery, those are: 1) listening 2) speaking 3)
writing and 4) reading.
A Foreign language is a new language that
is learnt by people. The new language is learnt only in formal education, but
it's not used in the daily life. Example, Indonesian people learn English only
in the school, but in their daily life, they never use it.
In learning foreign language, we must know
the culture of the country that we are learning their language. Moreover, we as
a person who learns the language of that State will not became
misunderstandings in talking with people of that State. Then, studying the
culture of the State whose language we are studying is a necessity to avoid
misunderstanding between us and those of that State.
Culture is a view structure of human
activities that consist of behaviors, values, arts, beliefs, languages, custom,
behavior, religion, law, integrity, and code of honors. In studying the culture
we must understand what is cross cultural understanding, where this cross
cultural understanding learns cultural issues in each country, the language
used in each country, how people in each country greet each other and learn
about how religion there, Beliefs held, behavior, values and so on.
According to Levine and Adelman (1993),
cross-cultural or intercultural communication occurs between people from
different cultures. Moreover, Williams (2003) defined cross-cultural
communication skills as the ability to efficiently interact with people of different
cultures. Hinner (1998) referred to the same concept as the ability to communicate
verbally and nonverbally with members of different cultures, and in a manner
that communicative messages were not given erroneous interpretations. Whereas, some
researchers suggested that the familiarity of the cultures in which the
communication took place was a key component of many existing cross-cultural
training programs (Gudykunst, William & Young, 1984).[1]
After we learn about the culture of the
country whose language we learn by understanding about cross cultural
understanding, then, we can speak foreign languages well without making the
people who hear us is misunderstand with the purpose of our conversation.
On the other hand, we can do the better in
improving our speaking skills because we already understand how we should to talk
toward understand the culture in every country. Indirectly, our speaking skills
will increase over time as we study the cultural problem of how we should speak
well without making people offended by our utterances because the purpose of
our conversation does not reach those who listen it.
Speaking is one of skills in learning
English that is very important, because speaking is an interactive process of
constructing meaning that involves producing, receiving and processing
information. We can say that speaking means to conversed or expressing one’s
thoughts and feelings in spoken language. To speak often implies conveying
information. It may be from an informal remark to a scholarly presentation to a
formal address. Speaking skills are the skills that give us the ability to
communicate effectively. Speaking skills also help to assure that one will not
be misunderstood by those who are listening.
2. METHODS
This study was
categorized into a case study by using a quantitative approach. Quantitative
research is a process of finding data in the form of knowledge which uses the
numbers as a means of finding information about what we want to know. In
general, quantitative research can be carried out as well as descriptive
research. Quantitative research can also be a research relationship or
correlation study, quasi-experimental research, and experimental research.[2] The
aim of this study was to increase speaking ability and to know about the
culture from the other countries.
Sugiyono (2011:
126) states that the larger amount of the sample will minimize the
generalization mistakes.[3] The
instruments for collecting the data in this study were an oral test. The test
was used to gather data about speaking performance. The test included the pronunciation,
the intonation, the articulation, the fluency and diction of their speaking.
Not only that butt also have we tested about their vocabulary. In conducting
the test, the students did spontaneously to get the authentic data. It means
that they were not given treatment before the test.
3. RESULTS
The
collected oral tests were identified. Next, the identified data were classified
according to the criteria of assessment. After that, less value and more than
73 or average value of each criteria of assessment was counted. The next step
was explaining the assessment. The calculation of the assessment can be seen in
Table 1.
Table 1
Result of the assessment
No
|
Criteria of assessment
|
<73
|
>73
|
1
|
Pronunciation
|
12
|
21
|
2
|
Intonation
|
11
|
22
|
3
|
Articulation
|
9
|
24
|
4
|
Fluency
|
10
|
23
|
5
|
Diction
|
13
|
20
|
Total number
|
55
|
110
|
The total
number of the assessment is found in the students' oral tests is 55 for grades
less than 75 or less than the average and 110 for grades over 75 or more of the
rated divided into five groups of assessment: Assessment in pronounce the
words, assessment in their intonation, assessment in their articulation,
assessment in fluency to pronounce the words, and in the used of diction.
There are
three assessments in pronounce the words, such as: always pronounce the word
with the correct pronunciation and listeners can understand the intent,
pronunciation is good but the audience less familiar with intent words, and the
Pronunciation still not completely so that the listener does not understand the
purpose of his words.
There are
three assessments in intonation, such as: the intonation is good so that the
listeners can understand what their feel, the intonation less good so that the
listener is less understand what their feel, and the intonation is not good
that makes the listener does not understand at all about the words and what
their feel.
There are
three assessments in articulation, such as: always speak with a clear articulation
so that the listener knows the intent, articulation is already nearly perfect
but the audience is still not sure what the purpose of his words, and
articulation is not clear so that the listener does not understand his point.
There are
three assessments in fluency to pronounce the words, such as: fluent in
pronounce the words can make the listeners understand what their mean, less
fluent in pronounce the words can make the listeners less understand what their
mean, and not fluent in pronounce the words can make the listeners does not
understand what their mean.
There are
three assessments in the used of diction, such as: exact in the used of diction
can make listeners know what their mean and what is the purpose, less Exact in
the used of diction can make listeners less understand what their mean and what
is the purpose of their speak, and not Exact in the used of diction can make
listeners do not know what their mean and what is the purpose of their speak
and can make the listeners misunderstanding.
There were
many factors affecting students speaking performance such as: topical knowledge,
listening ability, motivation to speak, teachers’ feedback during speaking
activities, confidence, pressure to perform well, and time for preparation.[4]
4. DISCUSSIONS
In improving the speaking ability there are
several factors that must be learned first, such as; the first is learn how to
pronounce the word well and correctly. The second is learning articulation
correctly so that what we say is not wrong. The third is learn the right
intonation, how to make the listener know the meaning of the saying whether it
is angry or something else. The fourth is fluent in pronounce a sentence or
word in English, if we not fluent, people will be lazy to hear it and just
silent without any response at all. The last is choose the good and correct
diction, because if we choose the wrong word then most likely the intent of
what we are talking about will not be conveyed even will lead to
misunderstandings between the speaker and the listener.
Learning foreign language not only must
have good speaking skills, but also we need to know a good way to convey
something so as to avoid misunderstandings. Of course, to understand all that
we need to know what kind of talking culture is commonly used in the country.
For example, greeting, every country has a different way of greeting. For
example in USA they do peace bumping for greeting while in Tibet they do
sticking out the tongue to each other.
In addition we also need to know whether in
the country use verbal communication or non verbal communication in everyday
life and whether they use ping pong conversation styles or bowling conversation
styles. For example countries that use ping pong conversation style is America,
Russia, Italy, Spanish, and Germany. Examples of countries using bowling
conversation styles are Japan, Korea, Indonesia, China, and all of the Asian
countries used it.
To learn all these things we must study
Cross Cultural Understanding. Therefore, we will know the right and correct way
of speaking to each others in different countries and will not lead to
misunderstandings because we do not know the good way to say something.
From the graph above we can concluded that,
if the students understand about Cross Cultural Understanding well, then
automatically he will have good speaking ability so that will not make the
listener to be misunderstood.
If the student can understand about Cross
Cultural Understanding well, then the student has been included in the criteria
of the first assessment is good and high.
If the students understand about Cross
Cultural Understanding but there are still some who do not understand well,
then the student is included in the second assessment criteria that is good but
still in the middle level.
While students who have a good
understanding of the Cross Cultural Understanding are still lacking and are not
very clear on what is meant or the student understands very little about Cross
Cultural Understanding, the student is still very poor in his or her
comprehension and the student is included in the third criterion low.
In conclusion, if the students already
understand how and what is the meaning of Cross Cultural Understanding then
they will understand how to speak well in unity with the culture of the country
itself then automatically with frequent training and add vocabulary
continuously in the learning, the student will increase Their speaking
abilities.
CONCLUSIONS
As mentioned
earlier, this study aimed to increase students speaking ability. The results of
the study indicate that the students faced many problems such as (1) they did
not pronounced the words correctly; (2) they intonation is not true, so can
make the listeners not understand; (3) they did not pronounced the words with
the right articulation; (4) they did not fluency to pronounce the words; (5)
they did not chose the right diction. Therefore, the results show that there
were many factors affecting students speaking performance as follow: (1) topical
knowledge; (2) listening ability; (3) motivation to speak; (4) teachers’
feedback during speaking activities; (5) confidence; (6) pressure to perform
well and (7) time for preparation.
The total
assessment found in the students' oral test is 55 for grades less than 75 or
less than average and 110 for grades over 75 or more of the average rated into
five types of assessment. The result of the assessment analysis data shows that
the most prominent assessment is the error in the production of verbs. There
are 12 people who scored less than 75 and 21 people who scored more than 75 in
assessment to pronounce the words. It is followed by the assessment in their
intonation. The total number of this assessment is 11 people who score less
than 75 and 22 people who score more than 75. The assessment in their
articulation in the third rank with the total number of 9 people who scored
less than 75 and 24 people Who scored more than 75. The next is the assessment
of 10 people who scored less than 75 and 23 people who scored more than 75. The
last is the assessment in the used Of diction with the total number of 13
people who scored less than 75 and 20 people who scored more than 75.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like
to express my sincere gratitude to my lecturer Mr. Much Deiniatur who helped,
supported and encouraged me while I conducted this study.
Last but not
least, I would especially thank to my family, my close friends and my
classmates who supported and encouraged me to conduct this study
REFERENCES
Loretta Ya-Wen Teng, A Cross-cultural
Communication Experience at a Higher Education Institution in Taiwan, education
journal, introduction, page 2
Margono, metodologi penelitian pendidikan,
cetakan ke-8 (Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta, 2010), page 105
Nguyen Hoang Tuan and Tran Ngoc Mai, 2015,
Factors Affecting Students’ Speaking Performance At Le Thanh Hien High School,
Asian Journal of Educational Research, Volume 3, Number 2, page 9Gajah Putih,
journal of education, Volume 8, Number 1, page 61
Sungkawati Kardi Wahyuningsih, 2015,
Grammatical errors analysis in the descriptive writing of the semester 3
students of English Education Department of STAIN
APPENDICES
Instrument oral test
1. Telling about your personal identity?
2. Telling about your family?
3. Telling about your home?
4. Telling about your school?
5. Telling about your friends?
[1] Loretta Ya-Wen
Teng, A Cross-cultural Communication Experience at a Higher Education
Institution in Taiwan, education journal, introduction, page 2
[2] Margono,
metodologi penelitian pendidikan, cetakan ke-8 (Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta,
2010), page 105
[3] Sungkawati
Kardi Wahyuningsih,2015, Grammatical errors analysis in the
descriptive writing of the semester 3 students of English Education Department
of STAIN Gajah Putih, journal of education, Volume 8, Number 1, page 61.
[4] Nguyen Hoang
Tuan and Tran Ngoc Mai, 2015, Factors Affecting Students’ Speaking Performance
At Le Thanh Hien High School, Asian Journal of Educational Research, Volume 3,
Number 2, page 9
No comments:
Post a Comment